Footnotes (76)



The Potential Extraterritorial Consequences of Akamai

Timothy R. Holbrook

Emory University School of Law

September 29, 2012

Emory International Law Review, vol. 26, pp. 499-513
Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-227

In Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., the Federal Circuit redefined 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) to no longer require that a single entity perform all of the steps of a patented method for there to be active inducement of infringement. By doing so, the court divorced § 271(b) from the definitions of infringement found in § 271(a).

This severance creates a potential problem: unlike § 271(a), § 271(b) does not contain any territorial limitations. The acts of direct infringement defined by § 271(a) must occur within the United States, but there is no such restriction in § 271(b).

In NTP v. Research in Motion, the Federal Circuit articulated a strict rule of territoriality for infringing patented methods: every step of the method must be performed in the United States. Although the court found there was no active inducement under § 271(b), the basis for that decision was the territorial limits in § 271(a). Arguably those limits are now gone.

This Essay explores to what extent Akamai may have not only overruled NTP with respects to the performance of methods that cross national borders but also expanded the extraterritorial scope of § 271(b) even more broadly. It ultimately concludes that there is no legitimate basis to embrace the rule found in NTP and suggests that the courts should consider potential conflicts of law when assessing whether a U.S. patent can be used in the active inducement context to regulate activities outside of the United States.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: NTP, Research in Motion, Akamai, McKesson, Limelight, Epic, divided infringement, extraterritoriality, territoriality, method claims, system claims, centillion, BMC, 35 U.S.C. § 271

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 30, 2012 ; Last revised: January 20, 2013

Suggested Citation

Holbrook, Timothy R., The Potential Extraterritorial Consequences of Akamai (September 29, 2012). Emory International Law Review, vol. 26, pp. 499-513; Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-227. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2154277

Contact Information

Timothy Richard Holbrook (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-712-0353 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,036
Downloads: 540
Download Rank: 38,347
Footnotes:  76
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper