31 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2012 Last revised: 13 Jul 2015
Date Written: September 30, 2012
In United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), the Supreme Court restored the trespass test of Fourth Amendment law: Any government conduct that is a trespass onto persons, houses, papers, or effects is a Fourth Amendment 'search.' According to the Court, the trespass test had controlled the search inquiry before the reasonable expectation of privacy test was introduced in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). Although Katz had rejected the trespass test, Jones restored it. This essay examines the history of the Fourth Amendment search doctrine and reaches the surprising conclusion that the trespass test never existed. Pre-Katz decisions did not adopt a trespass test, and instead grappled with many of the same questions that the Court has focused on when applying the reasonable expectation of privacy test. The idea that trespass controlled before Katz turns out to be a myth of the Katz Court: Katz mischaracterized Fourth Amendment history to justify a break from prior precedent. Jones thus restores a test that never actually existed. The essay concludes by considering both the doctrinal and theoretical implications of the surprising history of the Fourth Amendment search doctrine.
Keywords: Fourth Amendment, Katz, reasonable expectation of privacy
JEL Classification: K14, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kerr, Orin S., The Curious History of Fourth Amendment Searches (September 30, 2012). 2012 Supreme Court Review 67 (2013).; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-107; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2012-107. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2154611