Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability?
48 Pages Posted: 4 Oct 2012 Last revised: 24 Feb 2016
Date Written: January 7, 2015
Abstract
We study the out-of-sample and post-publication return-predictability of 97 variables that academic studies show to predict cross-sectional stock returns. Portfolio returns are 26% lower out-of-sample and 58% lower post-publication. The out-of-sample decline is an upper bound estimate of data mining effects. We estimate a 32% (58% - 26%) lower return from publication-informed trading. Post-publication declines are greater for predictors with higher in-sample returns, and returns are higher for portfolios concentrated in stocks with high idiosyncratic risk and low liquidity. Predictor portfolios exhibit post-publication increases in correlations with other published-predictor portfolios. Our findings suggest investors learn about mispricing from academic publications.
Keywords: anomalies, arbitrage, limits of arbitrage, short selling, predicting stock returns
JEL Classification: G11, G12, G00, G14, L3, C1
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Register to support our free research
Recommended Papers
-
…and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
By Campbell R. Harvey, Yan Liu, ...
-
A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model
By Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French
-
By Andrew Ang
-
By Clifford S. Asness, Andrea Frazzini, ...
-
By Nick Baltas and Robert Kosowski
-
A Trend Factor: Any Economic Gains from Using Information over Investment Horizons?
By Yufeng Han, Guofu Zhou, ...
-
Relative Strength Strategies for Investing
By Meb Faber
-
By Ralph S. J. Koijen, Tobias J. Moskowitz, ...
-
By Pedro Barroso and Pedro Santa-clara