60 Pages Posted: 7 Oct 2012 Last revised: 24 Jan 2013
Date Written: October 3, 2012
Despite the exponential growth of piracy off the coast of Somalia since 2008, there have been no prosecutions of those who have profited most from ransom proceeds; that is crime bosses and pirate financiers. As U.S. courts begin to charge higher-level pirates, they must ascertain the status of customary international law as reflected in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. UNCLOS includes two forms of accessory liability suited to such prosecutions, but a number of ambiguities remain in the interpretation of these forms of liability. These lacunae cannot be explained by reference to the plain terms of the UNCLOS or the travaux préparatoires and leaving domestic jurisdictions to fill these gaps risks creating a fragmented, and potentially contradictory, legal framework. On the contrary, resort to general principles of law ascertained by international criminal tribunals creates a predictable, and consistent, understanding of these modes of responsibility. This article shows how the jurisprudence of the ad hoc criminal tribunals fills the gaps in the law related to incitement and intentional facilitation of piracy. It further shows how these modes of responsibility are particularly suited to charges of financing pirate organizations or inciting children to participate in pirate enterprises.
Keywords: piracy, modes of responsibility, law of the sea, international criminal law, international public law
JEL Classification: K14, K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Phillips, Roger L., Pirate Accessory Liability – Developing a Modern Legal Regime Governing Incitement and Intentional Facilitation of Maritime Piracy (October 3, 2012). Florida Journal of International Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2158023 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2158023