Ars Aequi 62 (2013), pp. 99-108
17 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2012 Last revised: 10 Mar 2013
Date Written: October 1, 2012
This article investigates how the law is perceived in hip-hop music. Lawyers solve concrete legal problems on basis of certain presuppositions about morality, legality and justice that are not always shared by non-lawyers. This is why a thriving part of academic scholarship deals with what we can learn about laymen’s perceptions of law from studying novels (law and literature) or other types of popular culture. This article offers an inventory and analysis of how the law is perceived in a representative sample of hip-hop lyrics from 5 US artists (Eminem, 50 Cent, Dr. Dre, Ludacris and Jay-Z) and 6 UK artists (Ms Dynamite, Dizzee Rascal, Plan B, Tinie Tempah, Professor Green and N-Dubz). After a methodological part, the article identifies four principles of hip-hop law. First, criminal justice is based on the age-old adage of an eye for an eye, reflecting the desire to retaliate proportionately. Second, self-justice and self-government reign supreme in a hip-hop version of the law: instead of waiting for a presumably inaccurate community response, it is allowed to take the law into one’s own hands. Third, there is an overriding obligation to respect others within the hip-hop community: any form of ‘dissing’ will be severely punished. Finally, the law is seen as an instrument to be used to one’s advantage where possible, and to be ignored if not useful. All four principles can be related to a view of the law as a way to survive in the urban jungle.
Keywords: law and literature, law and popular culture, music, hip-hop, punishment, respect, evolution
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Smits, Jan M. and Ernst, Andrei and Iseger, Steven and Riaz, Nida, If You Shoot My Dog, I Ma Kill Yo’ Cat: An Enquiry into the Principles of Hip-Hop Law (October 1, 2012). Ars Aequi 62 (2013), pp. 99-108. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2158178 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2158178