What is Jeopardy?

Craig Bradley

Indiana University Maurer School of Law


Trial Magazine (December 2012)
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 214

This article analyzes the 2012 case of Blueford v. Arkansas. Blueford was tried for murder for allegedly shaking his girlfriend’s baby to death. He claimed that it was an accident. He was tried for capital murder (death penalty waived), first degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide. The jury was told to consider the charges in order of seriousness, beginning with capital murder, and not moving on to first degree murder until it had reached a conclusion on capital murder, etc. After a time the jury announced that it could not reach a verdict. The judge asked the status of the case and the foreman announced that they had unanimously agreed that it was not capital murder or first degree murder but were hung 9-3 for conviction on manslaughter. After further consideration they were still hung and the judge declared a mistrial under “manifest necessity” without further discussing the status of the negotiations. The Court held that it was OK to retry Blueford for capital and first degree murder because, despite the foreman’s announcement, there had been no final resolution of those charges.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Double jeopardy, Manifest necessity

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 9, 2012 ; Last revised: July 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Craig, What is Jeopardy? (2012). Trial Magazine (December 2012); Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 214. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2158691

Contact Information

Craig Bradley (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 307
Downloads: 40
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Curious History of Fourth Amendment Searches
By Orin Kerr