The Perils of Non-Adversarialism: Commentary on Freiberg

European Journal of Criminology 8(1): 108-112, 2011

5 Pages Posted: 12 Oct 2012

See all articles by Leonidas K. Cheliotis

Leonidas K. Cheliotis

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Social Policy and Administration

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

Penological scholarship is evermore focused upon the vexing issue of rising punitiveness in criminal justice systems across the world. Freiberg’s work on penal reform constitutes a valuable addition to the debate about how to arrest this negative trend. The aim of this brief commentary is to problematise some of the presumptions which animate his proposed model. The argument outlined is that ‘non- or post-adversarialism’ does not axiomatically transcend punitive theories, structures, and practices. This is not merely a matter of flawed design or implementation of programmes, nor does it pertain simply to the punitive features inherent to non-adversarial philosophy as such, but, ultimately, concerns the potential role of humanistic discourses in camouflaging and thereby perpetuating punitiveness.

Suggested Citation

Cheliotis, Leonidas K., The Perils of Non-Adversarialism: Commentary on Freiberg (2011). European Journal of Criminology 8(1): 108-112, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2160938

Leonidas K. Cheliotis (Contact Author)

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Social Policy and Administration ( email )

Houghton Street
London, England WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
278
PlumX Metrics