Neither Panacea, Placebo, Nor Poison: Examining the Rise of Anti-Unemployment Discrimination Laws

39 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2012 Last revised: 20 Aug 2017

See all articles by Seth Katsuya Endo

Seth Katsuya Endo

University of Florida Levin College of Law; New York University (NYU)

Date Written: October 5, 2012

Abstract

Within the past several years, dozens of news stories have described employers refusing to consider currently unemployed candidates for job openings. In response to this perceived trend, about twenty states and the federal government have passed, or are considering, legislation designed to prohibit employers from discriminating against individuals based on their employment status.

This articles details the proposed and passed legislation, identifies the factors driving it, and analyzes its potential ramifications. After surveying the field of legislation, I contend that it is unreasonable to project that the laws will significantly reduce unemployment because there is only anecdotal data regarding the prevalence of discrimination against unemployed candidates in hiring and, regardless of the frequency of such a practice, none of the proposed or passed legislation directly promotes job creation. But I argue that the anti-unemployment discrimination legislation is a positive example of interest convergence in that it benefits the economy by reducing arbitrary discrimination in hiring and long-term unemployment, expresses a set of social values, and protects members of constitutionally-protected groups who likely are disproportionately impacted by current-employment requirements. I then discuss why the concerns advanced by the business community are overstated given the generally limited scope of the legislation, the lack of a private right of action, and legally-approved uses of employment status as a proxy for characteristics about which a business might reasonably care. In sum, when taking an objective look, the anti-unemployment discrimination legislation is neither panacea, placebo, nor poison.

Keywords: employment, hiring, unemployment, discrimination, disparate impact, anti-unemployment, discriminatory

Suggested Citation

Endo, Seth Katsuya, Neither Panacea, Placebo, Nor Poison: Examining the Rise of Anti-Unemployment Discrimination Laws (October 5, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2161046 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2161046

Seth Katsuya Endo (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

PO Box 357069
Gainesville, FL 32635
United States

New York University (NYU) ( email )

Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
613
PlumX Metrics