Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical

5 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2012

See all articles by Kevin Smith

Kevin Smith

University of Abertay Dundee

Date Written: November 2012


In opposition to the premises of Against Homeopathy – a Utilitarian Perspective, all four respondents base their objections on the central claims that homeopathy is in fact scientifically plausible and is supported by empirical evidence. Despite ethical aspects forming the main thrust of Against Homeopathy, the respondents’ focus on scientific aspects represents sound strategy, since the ethical case against homeopathy would be weakened concomitant with the extent to which any plausibility for homeopathy could be demonstrated. The trouble here is that the respondents are attempting to perpetuate a sterile debate. The notion that homeopathic preparations could have any biological effects represents a fringe viewpoint, one not entertained by serious scientists nor supported by reason and evidence. In the present article, I shall endeavour to explain why the respondents do not have a valid case. I will deal firstly with their general approach to scientific plausibility and evidence, and then consider some of the specific claims they have made. Finally, I will answer the philosophical arguments some of the respondents have raised.

Keywords: homeopathy, alternative medicine, complementary medicine, CAM

Suggested Citation

Smith, Kevin, Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical (November 2012). Bioethics, Vol. 26, Issue 9, pp. 508-512, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2162312 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x

Kevin Smith (Contact Author)

University of Abertay Dundee ( email )

Bell Street
Dundee, Scotland DD1 1HG
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics