Footnotes (52)



Early American Judicial Pragmatism, 1793-1949

Robert F. Blomquist

Valparaiso University Law School

October 19, 2012

Valparaiso University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-13

After the writings of Charles S. Peirce and William James became popular among intellectuals in the early twentieth century, American judges started to use pragmatic parlance to decide cases. Starting with a trilogy of opinions by Supreme Court of Florida Justice Thomas M. Shackelford, a variety of prominent jurists deployed pragmatic analysis in their opinions. These judges included Benjamin Cardozo, Learned Hand, Robert Jackson, and Jerome Frank. American judicial theorists can learn a lot from this early use of pragmatism language in judicial opinions written before 1950.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: pragmatism, judicial analysis

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 19, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Blomquist, Robert F., Early American Judicial Pragmatism, 1793-1949 (October 19, 2012). Valparaiso University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2164354 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2164354

Contact Information

Robert F. Blomquist (Contact Author)
Valparaiso University Law School ( email )
656 S. Greenwich St.
Valparaiso, IN 46383-6493
United States
219-465-7857 (Phone)
219-465-7872 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 535
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 198,191
Footnotes:  52