China's Limits to Growth? The Difference between Absolute, Relative and Precautionary Limits

Peter Ho and Eduard B. Vermeer (eds.), China’s Limits to Growth: Prospects for Greening State and Society, A Special Issue of Development and Change, 2006, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 255-271

19 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2012

See all articles by Peter Ho

Peter Ho

Delft University of Technology

Eduard B. Vermeer

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

The contributions in this volume have sought to delve into the question of whether the greening of state and society is a reality or a myth, by highlighting the case of one of the world’s fastest developing and most populous countries: China. The rise of China has worried many observers as it has led to a heightened pressure on the resources of the nation and the world. This has become painfully clear as a result of a sharp rise in soil, water and air pollution within China, as well as rising Chinese demand for natural and mineral resources such as oil, gas, timber and steel. The critical question concerning China’s development is whether it can actually ‘meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’?

Suggested Citation

Ho, Peter and Vermeer, Eduard B., China's Limits to Growth? The Difference between Absolute, Relative and Precautionary Limits (2006). Peter Ho and Eduard B. Vermeer (eds.), China’s Limits to Growth: Prospects for Greening State and Society, A Special Issue of Development and Change, 2006, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 255-271, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2165826

Peter Ho (Contact Author)

Delft University of Technology ( email )

Jaffalaan 5
P.O. Box 5015
Delft, Zuid-Holland 2600 GA
Netherlands

Eduard B. Vermeer

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
110
Abstract Views
655
Rank
543,696
PlumX Metrics