Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most

16 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2012

See all articles by Tim Wu

Tim Wu

Columbia University - Law School

Date Written: February 14, 2012


Now is a particularly important time to consider the relationship between antitrust and innovation. Both US and European antitrust en forcement authorities are taking a look at the state of competition on the Internet, an inquiry that puts into clear focus the need for antitrust to take seriously its relationship with innovation policy.

How would the enforcement of antitrust look if the promotion of innovation were its paramount concern? I present 3 suggestions: (1) law enforcement would be primarily concerned with the exclusion of competitors. (2) A competition law centered on promoting innovation would take very seriously its oversight of "innovation catalysts." Oversight of standard setting, platforms, and patents would be of paramount importance. (3) The timing of intervention would become a more crucial issue than it is today — as a matter of prosecutorial discretion considered independent of illegality.

Keywords: innovation, antitrust, internet, patents, standard setting, platforms, exclusion, competition law

Suggested Citation

Wu, Tim, Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most (February 14, 2012). Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 78, pp. 313-328, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2166525

Tim Wu (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics