Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM): The (Only) Means for Distinguishing Knowledge of Medical Causation From Expert Opinion in the Courtroom

Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, p. 741, 2012

Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 2168363

41 Pages Posted: 30 Oct 2012 Last revised: 9 Oct 2013

See all articles by Terence Davidson

Terence Davidson

University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - School of Medicine

Christopher P. Guzelian

Texas State University School of Business

Date Written: October 30, 2012

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) was first established in the 1980s when physicians and medical educators purposed to more uniformly apply standards of evidence gained from the scientific method to assess questions of medical causation. Now widely employed by physicians in medical decision making and during their selections of medical treatment, and nearly omnipresent in modern medical student education, EBM allows doctors to separate scientific facts from opinions in determining clinical treatment efficacy. Accordingly, EBM — whether in a hospital or in a courtroom — is the systematic method capable of distinguishing expert pronouncements about medical or scientific questions of causation as either (1) authority-based opinions (derived from expert intuition or reasoning, principles of pathophysiology, or inference based on experimental or observational data of insufficient quality) or (2) evidence-based conclusions (objective knowledge arising from the availability of sufficient, high-quality evidence).

This article recommends that EBM should supplement ineffective legal gatekeeper rules of scientific evidence and be incorporated into the courtroom to (1) accurately distinguish medical knowledge from mere expert opinion and (2) thereby assist the court in correctly adjudicating disputed medical matters and toxic industrial or environmental exposure cases.

Keywords: Evidence-Based Medicine, EBM, scientific evidence, medical malpractice, environmental

JEL Classification: K13, K32, K41

Suggested Citation

Davidson, Terence and Guzelian, Christopher P., Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM): The (Only) Means for Distinguishing Knowledge of Medical Causation From Expert Opinion in the Courtroom (October 30, 2012). Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, p. 741, 2012; Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 2168363. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2168363

Terence Davidson

University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - School of Medicine ( email )

9500 Gilman Drive
MC 0507
La Jolla, CA 92093
United States

Christopher P. Guzelian (Contact Author)

Texas State University School of Business ( email )

San Marcos, TX 78666
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Abstract Views
974
rank
230,182
PlumX Metrics