Disentangling Income Inequality and the Redistributive Effect of Taxes and Transfers in 20 LIS Countries Over Time
LIS Working Paper No. 581
48 Pages Posted: 30 Oct 2012 Last revised: 31 Oct 2012
Date Written: September 10, 2012
Abstract
In most OECD countries the gap between rich and poor has widened over the past decades. This paper analyzes whether and to what extent taxes and social transfers have contributed to this trend. Has the redistributive power of different social programs changed over time? The paper contributes to the literature by disentangling several parts of fiscal redistribution in a comparative setting. We use micro-data from the Luxembourg Income Study to examine household market inequality, redistribution from transfers and taxes, and the underlying social programs that drive the changes, for 20 countries from the mid-1980s to mid-2000s. The contribution of each program is estimated using a sequential accounting budget incidence decomposition technique. The aim of this paper is to offer detailed information on the redistributive impact of social transfer programs. We focus on changes in fiscal redistribution of 13 different social programs and taxes. We observe a sizeable increase in primary household inequality in all 20 countries over the last 25 years (except Ireland). In most countries, the extent of redistribution has increased too. Tax-benefit systems have offset two-third of the average increase in primary income inequality, although they appear to have become less effective in doing so since the mid-1990s. We find that the public old age pensions and the survivors scheme attribute 60 percent to the increase of redistribution during the period 1985-2005 for a subset of countries considered (with full tax/benefit information). Social assistance accounts for 20 percent, and the benefits for sickness, disease, and disability account for around 13 percent of the total increase in redistribution. Other transfers (invalid career benefits, education benefits, child care cash benefits and other child and family benefits) account for 22 percent of the total increase in redistribution. On the contrary, taxes slowed down redistribution by 17 percent during 1985-2005.
Keywords: welfare states, social income transfers, inequality, Gini coefficient, LIS
JEL Classification: H53, H55, and I32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Income Distribution and Poverty in Selected OECD Countries
By Jean-marc Burniaux, Thai-thanh Dang, ...
-
Trends and Driving Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in the OECD Area
-
Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s
-
Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in Comparative Perspective
-
The Distributional Impact of Social Transfers in the European Union: Evidence from the Echp
By Christopher Heady, Theodore Mitrakos, ...
-
Relative or Absolute Poverty in the US and EU? The Battle of the Rates
By Geranda Notten and Chris De Neubourg
-
Income Distribution and Social Security in an OECD Perspective
By Koen Caminada and Kees Goudswaard
-
The Australian System of Social Protection – An Overview (Second Edition)
By Peter Whiteford and Gregory Angenent