Harmonizing National Laws, Procedures and Judicial Review of Mergers in the EU and EEA

71 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2012 Last revised: 4 Feb 2013

See all articles by John Temple Lang

John Temple Lang

University of Dublin - Trinity College; Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

Date Written: April 7, 2011

Abstract

There has been a great deal of discussion of the need for harmonisation of national merger control laws and procedures throughout the world, but less discussion, at least in public, of the need and scope for harmonisation of the same laws within the EU and EEA. This paper is intended to call attention to some of the issues. The present situation in Europe has developed withoutcoordination, and without serious discussion or study at European level.

National competition laws on restrictive agreements have been effectively harmonised, as far as agreements affecting trade between Member States is concerned, by Article 3 of Regulation 1/2003 and the corresponding EEA measures, which essentially obliged national authorities to apply Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 EEA when dealing with such agreements. However, no efforts have been made in the European Competition Network to harmonise either national laws corresponding to Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 EEA, or national merger control rules. In these respects the EU has not got a coordinated network, or even a comprehensive view of what the solution should be.

The structure of this paper is as follows: - Section B summarizes the present position. - Section C gives reasons why harmonisation is needed. - Section D considers legal questions of referral of cases from one competition authority to another and the possibility of challenging referrals under existing law. - Section E considers harmonisation of substantive rules on mergers. - Section F discusses harmonisation of procedures of national authorities. They must comply with Article 6, European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). - Section G considers harmonisation of rules on judicial review of merger decisions. Judicial review of national authorities’ merger decisions must be sufficient to comply with Article 6, ECHR. - Section H suggests some conclusions.

It will be seen that in this context procedural and substantive issues are related, and cannot be considered completely separately from one another.

Suggested Citation

Temple Lang, John, Harmonizing National Laws, Procedures and Judicial Review of Mergers in the EU and EEA (April 7, 2011). 18th St.Gallen International Competition Law Forum ICF, April 7th and 8th 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2173386

John Temple Lang (Contact Author)

University of Dublin - Trinity College ( email )

2-3 College Green
Dublin, Leinster D2
Ireland

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP ( email )

Rue de la Loi 57
Brussels, 1040
Belgium

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
105
Abstract Views
682
rank
288,477
PlumX Metrics