Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2176986
 
 

Footnotes (185)



 


 



New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. Thompson


Ellen Yaroshefsky


Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law

November 16, 2012

Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Vol. 25, No. 913, 2012

Abstract:     
The New Orleans Prosecutor's office under the 30 year leadership of Harry Connick was notorious for its failures to comply with constitutional requirements to disclose favorable information to the defense. The Supreme court in a range of cases including its 2011 decision in Connick v. Thompson, excoriated the prosecutor's office for its failures.

Leon Cannizzaro, elected as New Orleans prosecutor in 2008, made significant changes in that office. This article, the result of in depth interviews with key stakeholders in the New Orleans criminal justice system, including former prosecutors, examines the extent and effect of the policy and practice changes. It concludes with a series of proposals to improve disclosure practices in New Orleans that are applicable to other jurisdictions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: prosecutors, disclosure, Brady, New Orleans, Thompson


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 20, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Yaroshefsky, Ellen, New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. Thompson (November 16, 2012). Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Vol. 25, No. 913, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2176986

Contact Information

Ellen Yaroshefsky (Contact Author)
Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
516-463-5882 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,161
Downloads: 339
Download Rank: 68,562
Footnotes:  185
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Prosecutors and Professional Regulation
By Bruce Green