The International Law Commission and the Development of International Investment Law

20 Pages Posted: 18 Nov 2012 Last revised: 20 Dec 2012

See all articles by James Harrison

James Harrison

University of Edinburgh - School of Law

Date Written: November 17, 2012

Abstract

International investment law has received increasing attention due to the proliferation of investment treaties and the number of arbitral awards made thereunder. At the end of 2011, there were 450 known investment cases that have been settled or are pending. Yet, there are many core questions that remain to be authoritatively answered. Although they are faced with similar problems, arbitral tribunals often adopt diverging solutions to investment disputes. This paper considers the nature of the divergences in investment treaty jurisprudence and the role that could potentially be played by the International Law Commission (ILC) in contributing to the coherent development of international investment law. The paper argues that some areas of international investment law are more appropriate for attention by the ILC than others. It draws a distinction between those aspects of international investment that only have a basis in treaty law and those aspects of international investment law that are underpinned by common standards stemming from customary international law or general principles of law. The paper argues that we cannot necessarily expect the convergence of jurisprudence in the context of treaty provisions that have been specifically negotiated by the parties, as these provisions must be interpreted on a case-by-case basis. This means that topics like the MFN clause are less suitable for codification, as the meaning of these provisions will often depend on the particular context of the treaty and the precise intentions of the parties. In contrast, there is a stronger case for the codification of international investment law where common standards exist. The paper therefore considers the formation and development of customary international law in relation to investment protection. It argues that whilst investment treaty tribunals have struggled with the identification of customary international law in this area, the ILC could play a central role in clarifying the state of the relevant rules and principles, in furtherance of its core mandate of promoting the progressive development and codification of international law.

Keywords: International Investment Law, International Law Commission, Fragmentation of International Law, Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment, Codification, Customary International Law

Suggested Citation

Harrison, James, The International Law Commission and the Development of International Investment Law (November 17, 2012). Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2012/27. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2177291 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2177291

James Harrison (Contact Author)

University of Edinburgh - School of Law ( email )

Old College
South Bridge
Edinburgh, EH8 9YL
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
301
Abstract Views
1,252
rank
102,669
PlumX Metrics