Procedura de rezoluţiune a unui contract: comunicare sau hotărâre (The Procedure of Having the Contract Terminated: Notice or Judgment)

International Conference 'Tradition and Reform in the Romanian Society, European Highlights', Iasi, Romania (23-24 March 2012)

Journal of Legal Studies, Year VII, No. 1-2, Supplementary Issue No. 3, pp. 115-138, Chisinau, Moldova (June 2012)

24 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2012

Date Written: March 25, 2012

Abstract

In this study the author examines the two types of procedures of having a contract terminated: by giving notice to the other party or by filing a legal action against the other party and obtaining a judgment by which termination is ordered. Termination of a contract by a judge has deep historical roots in the varying legal systems, such as the French, Romanian or Russian legal systems. It indicates that a contract should be difficult to put an end to and it would usually compensate for the absence of a detailed system of legal grounds for termination of contract, thus requiring a deeper involvement and oversight of the judiciary.

The ability of a party to set the contract aside by giving notice to the other party, and without involving the court, is considered to be a sign of a modern contract law, as it is faster and tends to avoid the uncertainties of the court. This system is supported in the common law, the German or Dutch legal system, as well as the UN Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) or the Draft Common Frame of Reference of the European Union.

The Moldovan Civil Code of 2002 dramatically shifted from termination by a judge to termination by notice, whereas the new Romanian Civil Code of 2009 made a step towards termination by notice for certain limited situations, while maintaining a default rule of intervention of the judge in the procedure of putting an end to the contract.

The author conducts an analysis of the virtues and disadvantages of each procedural system and attempts to uncover and propose solutions to various procedural issues which arise in either system. He also shows how the procedural and material aspects of the legal institution at hand are intertwined and interdependent.

The study concludes that, while termination by notice is a progress, the intervention of the court cannot be excluded in any of the two systems, since a disputed termination will, in any event, be heard and finally resolved by a judge. Therefore, regardless of the ideological choice made by a legal system, termination by notice and oversight by a judge most often go together in the intricate process of having the contract terminated.

Note: Downloadable document is in Romanian.

Keywords: contract, agreement, termination, notice, avoidance, rescission

JEL Classification: K12, K20

Suggested Citation

Cazac, Octavian, Procedura de rezoluţiune a unui contract: comunicare sau hotărâre (The Procedure of Having the Contract Terminated: Notice or Judgment) (March 25, 2012). International Conference 'Tradition and Reform in the Romanian Society, European Highlights', Iasi, Romania (23-24 March 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2177825

Octavian Cazac (Contact Author)

Moldova State University ( email )

Alexei Mateevici St 60
Chisinau, Chisinau MD-2009
Moldova

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
309
rank
390,633
PlumX Metrics