Civic Capital in Two Cultures: The Nature of Cooperation in Romania and USA
61 Pages Posted: 24 Nov 2012 Last revised: 8 Jan 2014
There are 2 versions of this paper
Civic Capital in Two Cultures: The Nature of Cooperation in Romania and USA
Civic Capital in Two Cultures: The Nature of Cooperation in Romania and USA
Date Written: October 1, 2013
Abstract
We experimentally investigate the nature of cooperation in various repeated games, with subjects from Romania and USA. We find stark cross-country differences in the propensity to sustain multilateral cooperation through bilateral rewards and punishments. U.S. groups perform well because sufficiently many cooperators are willing to discipline free riders. Romanian cooperators are less prone to jeopardize their productive bilateral relationships for the benefit of the group, collectively failing to provide adequate discipline. Our analysis indicates that the performance differences constitute a group-level phenomenon, being largely due to differences in shared beliefs rather than differences in individuals’ preferences.
Keywords: cooperation, culture, public goods game, reward, punishment, antisocial punishment, spite
JEL Classification: C70, C90, C91, C92, C93, D60, D64, D70, F00, H00, Z10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods
By Martin Sefton, Robert Shupp, ...
-
Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Driving Forces of Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Punishing Free-Riders: How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods
-
Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Good Experiments
By Urs Fischbacher and Simon Gaechter
-
The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation
By James Andreoni, William T. Harbaugh, ...