Pragmatic Discourse and Gender Inequality in China
Law & Society Review, Forthcoming
48 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2012
Date Written: November 30, 2012
Abstract
Using courtroom dialogues in actual court trials in China as data, this article analyzes an emerging “pragmatic discourse,” deployed by judges to assist but the same time to constrain divorcing women. Through questions, statements, rebuttals, and other interactional devices, Chinese judges define the premises that underpin the law’s understanding of gender equality and women’s welfare. By looking at how discourses are deployed by judges and litigants, we link micro linguistic practices to more general social forces and processes. Despite their honest effort to protect women’s rights, Chinese judges often inadvertently reinforce and reproduce the patriarchal norm. The data demonstrate how the hegemonic patriarchal order reasserts itself in an institutional forum that is meant to promote gender equality. The interaction of the discourses also highlights the tensions in Chinese society and displays the effect of changing social environment on the legal operation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings in China
By Vicki C. Waye and Ping Xiong
-
Shaping Citizenship: Chinese Family Law and Women
By Margaret Woo
-
What We Know and What We Should Know About American Trial Trends
-
Internal Contradictions of Judicial Mediation in China
By Xin He and Kwai Hang Ng
-
In the Name of Harmony: The Erasure of Domestic Violence in China's Judicial Mediation
By Xin He and Kwai Hang Ng