Emissions Trading with Offset Markets and Free Quota Allocations

35 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016

Date Written: November 1, 2012

Abstract

This paper studies interactions between a "policy bloc's" emissions quota market and an offset market where emissions offsets can be purchased from a non-policy "fringe" of countries (such as for the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol). Policy-bloc firms enjoy free quota allocations, updated according to either past emissions or past outputs. Both overall abatement and the allocation of given abatement between the policy bloc and the fringe are then inefficient. When the policy-bloc quota and offset markets are fully integrated, firms buying offsets from the fringe, and all quotas and offsets, must be traded at a single price; the policy bloc will either not constrain the offset market whatsoever, or ban offsets completely. These cases occur when free allocation of quotas is less (very) generous, and the offset market delivers large (small) quota amounts. Governments of policy countries would instead prefer to buy offsets directly from the fringe at a price below the policy-bloc quota price. The offset price is then below the marginal damage cost of emissions and the quota price in the policy bloc is above the marginal damage cost. This is also inefficient as the policy bloc, acting as a monopsonist, purchases too few offsets from the fringe.

Keywords: Climate Change Economics, Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases, Markets and Market Access, Energy Production and Transportation, Carbon Policy and Trading

Suggested Citation

Rosendahl, Knut Einar and Strand, Jon, Emissions Trading with Offset Markets and Free Quota Allocations (November 1, 2012). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6281. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2183051

Knut Einar Rosendahl (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

No Address Available

Jon Strand

World Bank ( email )

1818 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
250
PlumX Metrics