Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Failure of the Attraction Effect Among Unattractive Alternatives

Posted: 7 Dec 2012 Last revised: 19 Jun 2013

See all articles by Steve Hoeffler

Steve Hoeffler

Vanderbilt University - Marketing

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

Many important decisions that consumers face involve choosing between options that are unattractive or undesirable - the proverbial "lesser of two evils." Consumers, who face budget or geographical constraints, for example, end up with mostly undesirable consideration sets; yet a choice is necessary. We examine the role of option set desirability in the context of the well established attraction effect. In five studies, we show that the attraction effect occurs in desirable domains but is eliminated when all the options are undesirable (Experiments 1-4). We further find that this asymmetric effect is consistent with a shift in decision makers' processing styles. Decision makers show more vigilant processing when making choices among undesirable (vs. desirable) domains (Experiments 3A and 3B), which results in an attenuated attraction effect (Experiment 4). Our results indicate that the attraction effect might not be as robust as generally thought and establishes (un)desirability as an important boundary condition.

Suggested Citation

Hoeffler, Steve, Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Failure of the Attraction Effect Among Unattractive Alternatives (2012). Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management Research Paper No. 2185439. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2185439

Steve Hoeffler (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Marketing ( email )

Nashville, TN 37203
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
360
PlumX Metrics