Basic Income, Unemployment and Job Scarcity

Recherches Economiques de Louvain, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 369-387, 2004

20 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2012

See all articles by Loek F. M. Groot

Loek F. M. Groot

Utrecht University - School of Economics

Date Written: December 6, 2004

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to make plausible the claim that the case for a basic income (BI) is stronger, and that the level of BI should be higher, the higher the level of structural unemployment. Structural unemployment is taken here in a broad sense: it refers to the shortage of jobs vis-à-vis the labor force, or more precisely, vis-à-vis total labor supply (therefore, as indicated in the title, underemployment is a better term in this respect than unemployment). For instance, even if the official unemployment rate would be close to zero, there might still be a considerable shortage of jobs, manifested by a large number of (notably female) persons, not entitled to social benefits, but willing to do paid work. To highlight the link between BI and unemployment, the BI scheme will be compared with the Labor Rights scheme as devised by Hamminga (1992; 1995), in which shortage of jobs is the point of departure motivating the whole exercise.

Keywords: basic income, negative income tax, labour rights, unemployment

JEL Classification: H24, J3, J65, J680

Suggested Citation

Groot, Loek F. M., Basic Income, Unemployment and Job Scarcity (December 6, 2004). Recherches Economiques de Louvain, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 369-387, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2185849

Loek F. M. Groot (Contact Author)

Utrecht University - School of Economics ( email )

Kriekenpitplein 21-22
Adam Smith Building
Utrecht, 3584 EC
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
671
PlumX Metrics