Changes in the Size Distribution of U. S. Banks: 1960-2005
26 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2012
Date Written: 2006
Abstract
This article documents the large changes in the size distribution and size dynamics of banks from 1960 to 2005. The authors find that neither the lognormal distribution nor the Pareto distribution fit the entire distribution, though they each do better with subsets of the distribution. Gibrat's Law is tested and found to hold in the 1960s and 1970s, but not afterwards. Gross entry rates are found to be surprisingly robust over the entire period: there is no trend in the fraction of banks that comprise new entries. Finally, assuming that trends in size dynamics from 2000-2005 continue, a forecast of the number of banks predicts that the rapid decline in number of banks will slow down and the number of banks will level off.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Consolidation in the U.S. Banking Industry: Is the "Long, Strange Trip" About to End?
By Kenneth D. Jones and Tim Critchfield
-
Consolidation in the U.S. Banking Industry: Is the Long, Strange Trip About to End?
By Kenneth D. Jones and Tim Critchfield
-
Corporate Governance and Depository Institutions Failure: The Case of an Emerging Market Economy