Citations (1)


Footnotes (186)



Counterfeits, Copying and Class

Ann Bartow

Franklin Pierce Center for IP at UNH Law

May 1, 2012

Houston Law Review, Vol. 48, 2012

Consumers who want to express themselves by wearing contemporary clothing styles should not have to choose between expensive brands and counterfeit products. There should be a clear distinction in trademark law between illegal, counterfeit goods and perfectly legal (at least with respect to trademark law) 'knockoffs,' in which design attributes have been copied but trademarks have not. Toward that end, as a normative matter the aesthetic features of products should not be registrable or protectable as trademarks or trade dress, regardless of whether they have secondary meaning, just as functional attributes of a utilitarian nature are not eligible for Lanham Act protection. With enough advertising, any product feature can acquire distinctiveness. Only the assertive deployment of functionality bars by courts can prevent the illegitimate and costly construction of trademark-based product monopolies.

The purported trademark related harms that stem from the production and distribution of noncounterfeit knockoffs are, in reality, the effects of legitimate competition based on attributes such as price, quality, consumer appeal, and availability, with which trademark law should not interfere. Repressing or illegalizing knockoffs illegitimately prevents lower income people from procuring and enjoying goods with aesthetic attributes that are not properly monopolized through trademark law, and probably perversely increases the demand for counterfeit items.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: trademark, tradedress, likelihood of confusion, counterfeit, Lanham Act, knockoff, intellectual property, class, copying

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K19

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Bartow, Ann, Counterfeits, Copying and Class (May 1, 2012). Houston Law Review, Vol. 48, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2187409

Contact Information

Ann Bartow (Contact Author)
Franklin Pierce Center for IP at UNH Law
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 492
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 282,082
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  186
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper