Uncommon Approaches to Commons Problems: Nested Governance Commons and Climate Change

70 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2012 Last revised: 10 Jul 2013

See all articles by Blake Hudson

Blake Hudson

University of Florida College of Law

Jonathan D. Rosenbloom

Drake University Law School; Vermont Law School

Date Written: December 12, 2012

Abstract

Natural capital resources crucial to combatting climate change are potentially subject to tragic overconsumption absent a requisite degree of vertical government regulation of resource appropriators and/or horizontal collective action among resource appropriators. In federal systems, these vertical and horizontal approaches may (or may not) take place in any one of four scales — local, state, national, and global — “nested” one within another. Prior research has described how natural capital in federal systems of government, though privatized and/or subject to government regulation, may nonetheless remain in a tragic plight due to the allocation of governance authority in federal systems — an allocation that may or may not legally entrench the commons dynamic. This Article builds on that research to present a clearer picture of the complexity of natural capital resource commons and does so by first deconstructing the nested commons scales and describing for the first time a number of legal authority and political action scenarios that may either resolve natural capital commons dilemmas or facilitate commons tragedies within the scales of a federal governance structure. The Article then details the “divergent” vertical regulatory and horizontal collective action approaches to managing climate-crucial natural capital within each scale. The Article concludes by pointing toward future scholarship exploring how these “divergent” approaches within scales can become “convergent” by taking into account both legal constraints that may exist on vertical regulation across scales or horizontal collective action within scales as well as geopolitical circumstances positively or negatively impacting political action within scales. This convergent approach encourages the proper management of natural capital resources by more fully accounting for the complexities of the federal governance commons.

Suggested Citation

Hudson, Blake and Rosenbloom, Jonathan D., Uncommon Approaches to Commons Problems: Nested Governance Commons and Climate Change (December 12, 2012). 64 Hastings Law Journal 1273 (2013), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2188642

Blake Hudson (Contact Author)

University of Florida College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/blake-hudson

Jonathan D. Rosenbloom

Drake University Law School ( email )

27th & Carpenter Sts.
Des Moines, IA 50311
United States

Vermont Law School ( email )

68 North Windsor Street
P.O. Box 60
South Royalton, VT 05068
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
297
Abstract Views
1,365
rank
113,278
PlumX Metrics