The Case for Reasoned Criminal Trial Verdicts

34 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2012 Last revised: 17 Oct 2013

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

Discussion in the paper focuses on instituting a requirement that juries in criminal cases make public the reasons for their verdicts. The nature of such a requirement is elaborated, as is the way in which defects in the reasons provided might serve as a basis for appealing convictions. Various arguments for adopting such a requirement are considered, as are objections to doing so. In support of the requirement, I contend that it would enable defendants in criminal cases to ensure that their procedural rights have been respected. Such a requirement can also be construed as a condition of the legitimacy of exercises of political power and as an implication of the right of each person to be treated with equal concern and respect. The main objections to such a requirement concern its possible interference with jury independence and the complications and inefficiencies appeals of reasoned verdicts would produce.

Suggested Citation

Lippke, Richard, The Case for Reasoned Criminal Trial Verdicts (2009). Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 22(2), 2009: 313-330, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2189544

Richard Lippke (Contact Author)

Indiana University ( email )

Department of Criminal Justice
Bloomington, IN
United States
812-856-6049 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
340
PlumX Metrics