Industry Self-Governance and National Security: On the Private Control of Dual Use Technologies
UC Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy Working Paper No. GSPP12-005
28 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2012 Last revised: 29 Apr 2013
Date Written: April 28, 2013
Abstract
High tech industries often use R&D inputs that pose significant risk. We analyze the case where downstream firms manage this risk by using their buyer power to impose industrywide regulations on their suppliers. This “buyers decide" mechanism is fundamentally different from the existing economics literature in which industry‐wide standards are imposed by network effects. We show that where upstream firms face incomplete liability, downstream firms choose inefficiently low regulation and that ‐‐ contrary to the conventional wisdom ‐‐ threats of regulatory backlash make this problem worse. We also find that downstream firms with larger buyer power c.p. prefer stronger regulation. For the case of “dual use" technologies we show that information asymmetries may enable suppliers to propose deliberately low security standards to deter entry. Finally, we analyze the conditions under which downstream firms with large buyer power can impose their preferred regulation as the industry‐wide standard.
Keywords: dual use products, self-governance, self-regulation, private regulation, buyer-power
JEL Classification: L19, L51, K29
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Does Self-Regulation Reduce Pollution? Responsible Care in the Chemical Industry
-
The Performance of Voluntary Climate Programs: Climate Wise and 1605(b)
By William A. Pizer, Richard D. Morgenstern, ...
-
Does Industry Self-Regulation Reduce Accidents? Responsible Care in the Chemical Sector
