Radar Detectors, Fixed and Variable Costs of Crime

26 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 1997

See all articles by Timothy James Stanley

Timothy James Stanley

Stanford University - School of Engineering

Date Written: June 1995


Raising the sanction will always reduce the utility of the criminal. However, raising the sanction will not always lead to less crime, and may lead to more crime. If a criminal has the opportunity to commit multiple criminal acts and has fixed and variable costs of committing these acts, then an increase in the criminal sanction, over a certain range of sanctions, may actually lead the criminal to commit more crime. The reason is that as the sanction is increased, the criminal may increase his expenditures on fixed costs, which may decrease his variable costs of committing a criminal act. Once the criminal pays his fixed costs, they will be sunk costs, and thus they will no longer enter into the criminal's decision process of committing criminal acts. But the variable cost of crime will enter into the criminal's decision process. If raising the sanction leads to decreasing variable costs of crime then raising the sanction may actually lead to more crime. The example of the criminal's decision to purchase a radar detector and to speed is used to illustrate the point.

JEL Classification: J29, K14

Suggested Citation

Stanley, Timothy James, Radar Detectors, Fixed and Variable Costs of Crime (June 1995). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=219 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.219

Timothy James Stanley (Contact Author)

Stanford University - School of Engineering ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305-9025
United States
415-322-2783 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics