On the Interpretability of Law: Lessons from the Decoding of National Constitutions
British Journal of Political Science, FirstViewArticle, December 2012
University of Chicago Institute for Law & Economics Olin Research Paper No. 624
27 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2012
Date Written: December 18, 2012
Abstract
An implicit element of many theories of constitutional enforcement is the degree to which those subject to constitutional law can agree on what its provisions mean (call this constitutional interpretability). Unfortunately, there is little evidence on baseline levels of constitutional interpretability or the variance therein. This article seeks to fill this gap in the literature, by assessing the effect of contextual, textual and interpreter characteristics on the interpretability of constitutional documents. Constitutions are found to vary in their degree of interpretability. Surprisingly, however, the most important determinants of variance are not contextual (for example, era, language or culture), but textual. This result emphasizes the important role that constitutional drafters play in the implementation of their product.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Harmonization, Preferences, and the Calculus of Consent in Commercial and Other Law
By Saul Levmore
-
Excessive Litigation by Business Users of Free Internet-Platform Services
-
Mistake Under the Common European Sales Law
By Ariel Porat
-
International Paretianism: A Defense
By Eric A. Posner and David A. Weisbach
-
International Law and the Limits of Macroeconomic Cooperation
By Eric A. Posner and Alan Sykes
-
Reverse Regulatory Arbitrage: An Auction Approach to Regulatory Assignments
By M. Todd Henderson and Frederick Tung
-
The Role of Keyword Advertising in Competition among Rival Brands
By David S. Evans and Elisa V. Mariscal