Ignoring the Court's Order: The Automatic Stay in Immigration Detention Cases

Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 5, 2010

UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 321

37 Pages Posted: 20 Dec 2012

See all articles by Raha Jorjani

Raha Jorjani

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: December 19, 2012

Abstract

Current immigration laws governing the detention of noncitizens are rife with statutes and regulations that raise due process concerns. The Automatic Stay provision found at 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(i)(2) is one such regulation. This regulation allows the Department of Homeland Security to, in effect, ignore an Immigration Court’s order of release on bond in certain cases, simply by filing a notice with the Court stating their intention to invoke the Automatic Stay. This means that even where an Immigration Judge has determined that an individual should be released on bond, the Department of Homeland Security can choose to nullify that order by invoking the Automatic Stay. Once invoked, the Immigration Judge’s order of release is stayed pending final resolution from the Board of Immigration Appeals; a process that can take up to 177 days.

This article first provides a historical context for the Automatic Stay provision and compares the October 2001 regulations with the November 2006 regulations currently in place. The article argues that the 2001 regulations failed to cure the constitutional concerns raised by the previous ones. The article then examines the operation of the Automatic Stay in detail, exploring the way in which DHS derives an unfair legal advantage from the stay that impacts the outcome of any deportation case. Contextualizing the discussion in an exploration of the significance of human incarceration, the article also compares bail procedures in the federal criminal context to bond procedures in the civil immigration context, arguing that there are fewer due process protections in the latter. Finally, the author argues that the Automatic Stay provision is unconstitutional and recommends that it be immediately repealed.

Keywords: Immigration Detention, Immigrant Detention, Automatic Stay, Bond Hearing, Mandatory Detention

Suggested Citation

Jorjani, Raha, Ignoring the Court's Order: The Automatic Stay in Immigration Detention Cases (December 19, 2012). Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 5, 2010; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 321. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2191782

Raha Jorjani (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
rank
366,890
Abstract Views
922
PlumX Metrics