References (47)


Footnotes (1)



Democracy, National Responsibility and Climate Change Justice

Ludvig Beckman

Stockholm University - Department of Political Science

June 22, 2011

Democratization, 19:5, 843-864, 2012

Nations are regularly considered the main bearers of responsibility for climate change. Accordingly, the differences between nations are crucial in understanding how responsibilities should be distributed. In this account, I examine the relevance of differences in type of political regime to this end. The claim defended here is that democratic institutions are constitutive of the conditions for when members of nations can be held responsible as a collective for the outcomes affecting the climate. The implications of this account are demonstrated, first, in relation to claims of historical responsibility and, second, in relation to the burdens assigned to Annex I countries by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The analysis shows why democratic institutions – at present and in the past – are essential in order to conclude that the members of a nation share responsibility for the harm caused by the aggregate greenhouse emissions of their nation. In connection to this analysis, we also show why responsibility for the costs of climate change is sometimes justly placed on authoritarian nations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: climate change, collective responsibility, democracy, cooperative practices

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 23, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Beckman, Ludvig, Democracy, National Responsibility and Climate Change Justice (June 22, 2011). Democratization, 19:5, 843-864, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2192960

Contact Information

Ludvig Beckman (Contact Author)
Stockholm University - Department of Political Science ( email )
Stockholm, 106 91
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 276
Downloads: 29
References:  47
Footnotes:  1
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Collective Responsibility and National Responsibility
By Roland Pierik