Measuring Partisan Bias in Single-Member District Electoral Systems
46 Pages Posted: 2 Jan 2013 Last revised: 8 Jul 2013
Date Written: May 29, 2013
Abstract
In recent decades, the literature has coalesced around either symmetry or responsiveness as measures of partisan bias in single-member district systems. I argue neither accurately captures the traditional idea of an "efficient" gerrymander, where one party claims more seats without more votes. I suggest a better measure of efficiency and then use this new measure to reconsider a classic study of partisan gerrymandering. Contrary to the original study findings, I show that the effects of party control on bias are small and decay rapidly, suggesting that redistricting is at best a blunt tool for promoting partisan interests.
Keywords: redistricting, gerrymandering, partisan bias, electoral systems, elections, American politics
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King
-
How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science
By Gary King
-
A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King
-
Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House
By Gary King and Andrew Gelman
-
Representation Through Legislative Redistricting: A Stochastic Model
By Gary King
-
Democratic Representation and Partisan Bias in Congressional Elections
By Gary King and Robert X. Browning
-
Enhancing Democracy Through Legislative Redistricting
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King
-
'Truth' is Stranger than Prediction, More Questionable than Causal Inference
By Gary King
-
Political Parties and Foreign Policy: A Structure Approach
By Gary King
-
Estimating the Electoral Consequences of Legislative Redistricting
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King