The Best Gain-Loss Ratio is a Poor Performance Measure
18 Pages Posted: 8 Jan 2013
Date Written: January 7, 2013
Abstract
The gain-loss ratio is known to enjoy very good properties from a normative point of view. As a confirmation, we show that the best market gain-loss ratio in the presence of a random endowment is an acceptability index and we provide its dual representation for general probability spaces.
However, the gain-loss ratio was designed for finite Ω, and works best in that case. For general Ω and in most continuous time models, the best gain-loss is either infinite or fails to be attained. In addition, it displays an odd behaviour due to the scale invariance property, which does not seem desirable in this context. Such weaknesses definitely prove that the (best) gain-loss is a poor performance measure.
Keywords: Gain-loss ratio, acceptability indexes, incomplete markets, martingales, quasi concave optimization, duality methods, market modified risk measures
JEL Classification: G11, G12, G13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Risk Preferences and their Robust Representation
By Michael Kupper and Samuel Drapeau
-
Essential Supremum with Respect to a Random Partial Order
By Youri Kabanov and Emmanuel Lepinette
-
A Von Neumann-Morgenstern Representation Result Without Weak Continuity Assumption
By Michael Kupper, Freddy Delbaen, ...
-
Dynamic Quasi Concave Performance Measures
By Sara Biagini and Jocelyne Bion-nadal
-
Acceptability Indexes Via 'g-Expectations': An Application to Liquidity Risk
-
Essential Supremum and Essential Maximum with Respect to Random Preference Relations
By Youri Kabanov and Emmanuel Lepinette
-
Vector-Valued Risk Measure Processes
By Emmanuel Lepinette and Imen Tahar