27 Pages Posted: 10 Jan 2013
Date Written: Spring 2013
In systems industries, combinations of components are consumed together to generate user benefits. Arrangements among component providers sometimes limit consumers’ ability to mix‐and‐match components, and such exclusive arrangements have been highly controversial. We examine the competitive and welfare effects of exclusive arrangements among system components in a model of relatively differentiated applications that run on relatively undifferentiated platforms. We show that there is no “One‐Market‐Power‐Rent Theorem.” Specifically, exclusive deals with providers of differentiated applications can raise platforms’ margins without reducing applications’ margins, so that overall industry profits rise. Hence, for a given set of components and prices, exclusive arrangements can reduce consumer welfare by limiting consumer choice and raising equilibrium prices. In some cases, however, exclusivity can raise consumer welfare by increasing the equilibrium number of platforms, which leads to lower prices relative to the monopoly outcome that would prevail absent exclusivity.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hermalin, Benjamin E. and Katz, Michael L., Product Differentiation Through Exclusivity: Is There a One‐Market‐Power‐Rent Theorem? (Spring 2013). Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 1-27, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2198769 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jems.12008
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: jems.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.