How the Supreme Court Doomed the ACA to Failure

8 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2013 Last revised: 11 Feb 2013

See all articles by Thomas A. Lambert

Thomas A. Lambert

University of Missouri - School of Law

Date Written: January 2, 2013

Abstract

In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance mandate is constitutional because its penalty for non-insurance is a de facto tax. This article argues that the ruling may have preserved the ACA legally, but it likely doomed the law economically. Legal and legislative limits on the tax, coupled with the ACA’s prohibition on health insurers discriminating against preexisting conditions, results in a perverse incentive for non-low-income households to forgo insurance coverage until they face a high-cost medical problem, and then drop the insurance once the problem has been resolved. This perverse incentive extends to many employers, who would be financially better off to pay the tax and increase employee pay, rather than provide health insurance. As a result, insurance costs will likely soar while many people will go uncovered.

Keywords: Obamacare, Affordable Care Act, Supreme Court ruling, U.S. Constitution, Insurance Costs, Tax, Health Insurance

JEL Classification: H10, I11, I13, I18

Suggested Citation

Lambert, Thomas Andrew, How the Supreme Court Doomed the ACA to Failure (January 2, 2013). 35 Regulation, p. 32, Winter 2012-2013; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2199079

Thomas Andrew Lambert (Contact Author)

University of Missouri - School of Law ( email )

Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO MO 65211
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
Abstract Views
983
rank
267,162
PlumX Metrics