Lenin's Void: Towards a Kenogrammar of Management

Soziale Systeme, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 294-306, 2002

13 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2013

Date Written: April 5, 2001


There is no self-evident sociology of management. The cognitive focus of sociology seems to be at odds with the volitive aspects of management. The paper proposes to consider a possible approach, which consists in viewing management as the evolutionary mechanism of a social system, thus integrating volition with cognition. Evolution does not necessarily change the system. It may as well maintain it with respect to a changing environment. That is, the system changes anyhow. The paper looks into some possible notions informing such a view (II, III, IV), models it with respect to the case of the management of the Russian revolution in 1917 (V), and offers a conclusion (VI). The paper is the sketch of a possible 'kenogrammar' of management, not its elaboration. It proposes to consider emptiness, or void, as the necessary correlate of management action. Any purpose, considered by management action, consists in seeing nothing where something will be, be it a profit, a technological innovation, a network, or, indeed, a revolution. We refer to Gotthard G√ľnther's and Heinz von Foerster's concept of a kenogrammar in order to emphasize that there is no emptiness, or void, which is not surrounded, or accompanied, by determinateness.

Keywords: kenogrammar, Lenin, management, revolution

Suggested Citation

Baecker, Dirk, Lenin's Void: Towards a Kenogrammar of Management (April 5, 2001). Soziale Systeme, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 294-306, 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2200779

Dirk Baecker (Contact Author)

Witten/Herdecke University ( email )


HOME PAGE: http://catjects.wordpress.com

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics