Financial Liberalization and Contagion with Unobservable Savings
42 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2013 Last revised: 28 Oct 2016
Date Written: April 15, 2012
Abstract
How does the presence of decentralized market-based liquidity channels affect financial liberalization and contagion? In order to answer this question, I extend the Diamond and Dybvig (1983) model of financial intermediation to a two-country environment, in which banks in each country enjoy a comparative advantage in one investment technology, and individuals can borrow and lend in an unobservable market. In this environment, I prove that the possibility of hidden savings has three main effects. First, it improves welfare with respect to the autarkic equilibrium by allowing gains from 'hidden' financial integration. Second, it halts the process of 'official' financial integration. Third, it lowers the resilience of the economy to unexpected liquidity shocks.
Keywords: financial intermediation, liberalization, financial contagion, unobservable savings
JEL Classification: E44, G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Financial Integration and Systemic Risk
By Falko Fecht and H. P. Gruner
-
Financial Integration, Specialization and Systemic Risk
By Falko Fecht, Hans Peter Gruener, ...
-
Financial Integration, Specialization, and Systemic Risk
By Falko Fecht, H. P. Gruner, ...
-
Financial Integration, Specialization, and Systemic Risk
By Falko Fecht, H. P. Gruner, ...
-
Welfare Effects of Financial Integration
By Falko Fecht, H. P. Gruner, ...
-
Country and Industry Equity Risk Premia in the Euro Area: An Intertemporal Approach
By Lorenzo Cappiello, Marco Lo Duca, ...
-
Limits to International Banking Consolidation
By Falko Fecht and H. P. Gruner
-
European Financial Market Dependence: An Industry Analysis
By Söhnke M. Bartram and Yaw-huei Wang
-
European Financial Market Dependence: An Industry Analysis
By Söhnke M. Bartram and Yaw-huei Wang