Opportunity Lost: The Supreme Court of Canada Misses a Historic Chance to Consider Question of Public Interest Standing for Animal Interests

7 Pages Posted: 19 Jan 2013 Last revised: 25 Oct 2013

Peter Sankoff

University of Alberta - Faculty of Law

Date Written: January 16, 2013

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Canada recently denied leave to appeal in Reece v. Edmonton (City), a 2-1 decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal, which focused on the right of private parties to seek judicial intervention on behalf of animals. In this article, solicited by the Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, I will examine what was lost by this decision to deny leave, explore the important questions that were at stake in the appeal, and suggest why the Supreme Court should have decided otherwise.

Keywords: animal law, public interesting standing, supreme court of Canada, leave to appeal

Suggested Citation

Sankoff, Peter, Opportunity Lost: The Supreme Court of Canada Misses a Historic Chance to Consider Question of Public Interest Standing for Animal Interests (January 16, 2013). (2012) 30 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 129. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2201689

Peter Sankoff (Contact Author)

University of Alberta - Faculty of Law ( email )

Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5
Canada

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Rank
229,416
Abstract Views
475