Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything is a Crime

7 Pages Posted: 20 Jan 2013 Last revised: 13 Apr 2018

Date Written: January 20, 2013


Though extensive due process protections apply to the investigation of crimes, and to criminal trials, perhaps the most important part of the criminal process -- the decision whether to charge a defendant, and with what -- is almost entirely discretionary. Given the plethora of criminal laws and regulations in today's society, this due process gap allows prosecutors to charge almost anyone they take a deep interest in. This Essay discusses the problem in the context of recent prosecutorial controversies involving the cases of Aaron Swartz and David Gregory, and offers some suggested remedies, along with a call for further discussion.

Keywords: due process, criminal law, grand jury, plea bargain, overcriminalization, Robert Jackson, Tim Wu, Harvey Silverglate, Gene Healy

Suggested Citation

Reynolds, Glenn Harlan, Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything is a Crime (January 20, 2013). Columbia Law Review Sidebar, 2013, University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 206, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2203713 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2203713

Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Contact Author)

University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )

1505 West Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, TN 37996-1810
United States
865-974-6744 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics