Footnotes (69)



Supersession and Sovereignty

Jeremy Waldron

New York University School of Law

August 3, 2006

Julius Stone Address, August 3, 2006
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-33

This paper -- presented originally as the Julius Stone lecture at the University of Sydney (Australia) in 2006 -- considers the application of the thesis of "supersession of historic injustice" to issues of sovereignty. The supersession thesis has ben applied in the past to historic injustice concerning land and property rghts in formler colonial contexts; but it may also be applied to the historic legacy of the unjust subjugation of a people. It considers and criticizes reversion theories, which suggest that the proper remedy for unjust subjugation is some sort of reversion to the politcal status quo ante. The paper argues that this cannot be entertained without considering the great differences in statecraft and political circumstances that may have emerged since the time of the unjust subjugation. Those considerations may affect the way we apply the principle of self-determination to these contexts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: aboriginal rights, Australia, autonomy, historic injustice, indigenous peoples, New Zealand, political development, reversion, self-determination, self-government, sovereignty, state

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 24, 2013 ; Last revised: June 18, 2013

Suggested Citation

Waldron, Jeremy, Supersession and Sovereignty (August 3, 2006). Julius Stone Address, August 3, 2006; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-33. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2205708

Contact Information

Jeremy Waldron (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,097
Downloads: 256
Download Rank: 93,554
Footnotes:  69