Footnotes (134)



Legal Statements and Normative Language

Luís Duarte d'Almeida

University of Edinburgh - School of Law

January 25, 2013

Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/03

Can there be a non-reductivist, source-based explanation of the use of normative language in statements describing the law and legal situations? This problem was formulated by Joseph Raz, who also claimed to have solved it. According to his well-known doctrine of ‘detached’ statements, normative legal statements can be informatively made by speakers who merely adopt, without necessarily sharing, the point of view of someone who accepts that legal norms are justified and ought to be followed. In this paper I defend two theses. I argue, first, that the notion of a detached statement cannot be made to work, and that Raz’s problem is thus not thereby solved. But the problem itself, I also suggest, is a false one.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: legal 'ought', detached statements, normative language, legal positivism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 26, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Duarte d'Almeida, Luís, Legal Statements and Normative Language (January 25, 2013). Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2206811 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2206811

Contact Information

Luís Duarte d'Almeida (Contact Author)
University of Edinburgh - School of Law ( email )
Old College
South Bridge
Edinburgh, EH8 9YL
United Kingdom

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 984
Downloads: 212
Download Rank: 108,898
Footnotes:  134
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper