Luhmann, Habermas, and the Theory of Communication

Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17(3) (2000) 273-288

22 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2013

See all articles by Loet Leydesdorff

Loet Leydesdorff

University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)

Date Written: February 27, 1999

Abstract

In his critique of Luhmann’s sociology, Habermas (1987) argued that individuation and socialization are possible on the basis of linguistic structures. This critique touches the blind spot of sociological systems theory as a meta-biology. Whereas the paradigm shift from action theory towards communication theory was fully reflected in Luhmann’s sociology, the difference between the self-organization of social systems and the autopoiesis of biological systems remained underspecified. Social systems allow for communication about observations from within the system and/or from another perspective. Observers are able to participate both in the variation and in the selection; Giddens (1976) introduced in this context the metaphor of a ‘double hermeneutics.’ Through language the distinction between uncertainty and meaningful information is communicated reflexively, and the consequent codification may be changed without becoming confused. The implied communicative competences can be specified from the perspective of communication theory.

Keywords: self-organization, communication, sociology, Habermas, Luhmann, reflexivity

Suggested Citation

Leydesdorff, Loet, Luhmann, Habermas, and the Theory of Communication (February 27, 1999). Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17(3) (2000) 273-288. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2207714

Loet Leydesdorff (Contact Author)

University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) ( email )

PO Box 15793
Amsterdam, 1001 NG
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://www.leydesdorff.net

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
381
Abstract Views
1,363
rank
76,448
PlumX Metrics