Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

A Deference Theory of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

39 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2013  

Arpit K. Garg

Yale Law School

Date Written: April 1, 2012

Abstract

Although Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) is one of the most documented topics in legal scholarship, the academy has missed a crucial reading: a statute with an administrative agency, the Department of Justice (DOJ), entitled to Chevron-style deference. Because the topic is virtually unexplored, this Note is the first to outline how we might understand a deference theory of the VRA. In addition to articulating the theoretical case and exploring the historical evidence of deference in the Supreme Court, this Note offers a descriptive/normative explanation for the Court’s current hostile relationship towards the DOJ on Section 5 voting rights issues, what I term 'anti-deference.' Such insights represent the tip of the iceberg for what a deference theory of the VRA might unearth.

Suggested Citation

Garg, Arpit K., A Deference Theory of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (April 1, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2209636 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2209636

Arpit Kumar Garg (Contact Author)

Yale Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
404