33 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2013
Date Written: February 4, 2013
This article is about the concept of arbitration law and its relationship with international arbitration scholarship. It argues that the field of international arbitration scholarship has developed in isolation and never fully engaged with the crucial movements of international legal scholarship that advanced a more progressive and humanitarian concept of international law. The dearth of interdisciplinary scholarship in arbitration has had two undesirable implications. First, it has had a negative impact on how non-arbitration scholars and the public perceive arbitration. Secondly, and more importantly for the purposes of this article, it has crucially impaired the concept and autonomy of arbitration law. By remaining adherent to an old-fashioned version of positivism that accepts state regulation only, arbitration scholarship has failed to develop an account of international arbitration as a non-state community that has the capacity to produce legal rules. Eventually, it has failed to advance persuasive claims of normativity and autonomy of international arbitration. The article revisits the concept of arbitration law and advances the thesis that arbitration community has the normative potency to generate procedural practices and standards that guide the conduct of arbitration and breed expectations of compliance.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Brekoulakis, Stavros, International Arbitration Scholarship and the Concept of Arbitration Law (February 4, 2013). Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 36, 2013 (Forthcoming); Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 132/2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2211455