64 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2013 Last revised: 20 Aug 2013
Date Written: February 4, 2013
Disparate treatment doctrine has long been a swamp and it is getting deeper and murkier. The various judicially and legislatively created routes through the swamp – proof schemes – are poorly marked and, at best, imperfect. Critically, the routes through the swamp have become unmoored from the critical cause-in-fact inquiry they were ostensibly designed to illuminate.
Focusing on cause-in-fact, this article seeks to establish causal coherence in disparate treatment doctrine by applying – for the first time – modern cause-in-fact theory, including the necessary element of a sufficient causal-set (“NESS”) standard articulated in the Restatement (Third) of Torts, across the various individual disparate treatment statutes and theories. In order to implement this new-found causal coherence, this article proposes a better route through the swamp in the form of a unified proof scheme for use in all individual disparate treatment cases regardless of statute or theory that is rooted in this conception of causal necessity based on the ubiquitous McDonnell Douglas proof scheme.
Keywords: Disparate treatment, McDonnell Douglas, NESS, restatement (third) torts, cause-in-fact, factual causation, employment discrimination
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Clarke, Brian S., A Better Route Through The Swamp: Causal Coherence In Disparate Treatment Doctrine (February 4, 2013). 65 Rutgers L. Rev. 723 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2211778