19 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2013
Date Written: February 5, 2013
The requirement of disclosure in the patent specification is commonly presented as an essential arm of the patent bargain. This paper tests the assumption that disclosure requirements in a number of common law jurisdictions continue to reflect this and other shared origins of this doctrine. Instead we see forces such as Europeanisation and sector-specificity produce divergence and confusion over the purpose of sufficiency, particularly in the context of adjacent patentability criteria such as utility and nonobviousness. The result is a complex expression of this requirement that has eroded the normative strength of this doctrine as originally expressed in Liardet v Johnson.
Keywords: sufficiency, disclosure, utility, enablement, nonobviousness, breadth of claims
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Thambisetty, Sivaramjani, The Evolution of Sufficiency in Common Law (February 5, 2013). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 6/2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2212064 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2212064