Domestic Drone Use and the Mosaic Theory

Sean Sullivan

University of New Mexico - School of Law

December 3, 2012

UNM School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-02

The use of unmanned aerial drones - operated by remote pilots and capable of conducting pinpoint strikes on targets around the world - has revolutionized the fight against terrorism. Within the past few years, however, drones have also been used for domestic security and law enforcement purposes, and such local use is likely to expand in the near future. Whether the government’s use of emerging, sophisticated technologies comports with the 4th Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures has confounded the courts, and there are growing concerns that traditional 4th Amendment analyses are no longer workable in the context of modern technologies. In U.S. v. Jones (2011), the Supreme Court applied a relatively new doctrine, the “mosaic theory,” in determining whether the government’s use of technology, in this case a G.P.S. tracking system, was consistent with fundamental 4th Amendment protections.

This paper explores whether the “mosaic theory,” laid out by legal scholar Orin Kerr and espoused by the Court in Jones, can be applicable to 4th Amendment challenges to domestic drone use. This paper first explains the extent to which drones are already operational domestically, and briefly discusses proposals to expand their domestic capabilities; second, provides a brief overview of the traditional 4th Amendment analyses in the realm of emerging technologies, with an eye toward determining whether the “property-driven” or “reasonable expectation of privacy” doctrines are no longer applicable to such sophisticated technologies; third, discusses the Jones case as well as the “mosaic theory” in order to provide a solid foundation from which to draw conclusions about its applicability to domestic drone use; and fourth, analyzes a particular type of domestic drone use under the “mosaic theory” rubric, and determines whether it is an appropriate framework to ensure 4th Amendment protections in the context of emerging technologies going forward.

The domestic uses of drones are increasing and have been largely overlooked by the public. At the same time, the courts are struggling with how to check such use against the constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. An appropriate analytical framework is needed to assist the courts in ensuring that the government’s domestic use of drones does not infringe on the people’s well-established civil liberties before drones become an even more ubiquitous part of the domestic American experience or facilitate the creation of a perpetual “nanny state” under the guise of providing national security.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, search and seizure, right to privacy, reasonable expectation of privacy, mosaic theory, emerging technologies, domestic, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), automated license plate readers (ALPRs)

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2013 ; Last revised: June 1, 2014

Suggested Citation

Sullivan, Sean, Domestic Drone Use and the Mosaic Theory (December 3, 2012). UNM School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-02. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2212398 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2212398

Contact Information

Sean Sullivan (Contact Author)
University of New Mexico - School of Law ( email )
1117 Stanford NE
Albuquerque, NM 87131-1221
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,082
Downloads: 361
Download Rank: 63,617