Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Measuring the Downside Risk of Law School Attendance

11 Pages Posted: 11 Feb 2013  

James Ming Chen

Michigan State University - College of Law

Date Written: February 9, 2013

Abstract

Legal education has come under severe political pressure, both external and internal, for its perceived failure to deliver tangible economic benefits to law students. But legal education is not alone. The financial crisis of 2008 and the economic recession triggered by it have forced many other industries, to reevaluate their balance of costs and benefits. Many institutions, even entire industries, must now endure stress-testing in the form of debt-to-income or debt-to-capital ratios. This document focuses on student welfare, especially the core economic question of whether law school attendance delivers a valuable return on students’ investment. It also describe the tools, drawn from quantitative finance and econometrics, that it uses to evaluate downside risk and inequality within any cohort of law school graduates.

Suggested Citation

Chen, James Ming, Measuring the Downside Risk of Law School Attendance (February 9, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2214337 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2214337

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)

Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )

318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
226
Rank
113,166
Abstract Views
1,848