Conservatism and Innovation in Venture Capital Contracting

Lex Research Topics in Corporate Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2013-2

ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 213

34 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2013 Last revised: 16 May 2013

See all articles by Joseph A. McCahery

Joseph A. McCahery

Tilburg University - School of Law; European Banking Center (EBC); Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Erik P. M. Vermeulen

Tilburg University - Department of Business Law; Signify (formerly known as Philips Lighting) - Legal Department; Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Kyushu University - Graduate School of Law

Date Written: May 2013

Abstract

We conjecture that venture capitalists and their investors often fall prey to what is known as ‘collective conservatism.’ We investigate this conjecture by analyzing boilerplate provisions in limited partnership agreements. When investors accept suboptimal boilerplate provisions it is not because they believe that the standardized terms and conditions sufficiently align the interests of investors and fund managers, but merely because they think their peers, including their competitors, prefer to include them in the limited partnership agreement. We find that the financial crisis has facilitated some notable deviations in the boilerplate provisions that are aimed at returning confidence in the venture capital industry. We argue that a gradual shift may be taking place towards more investor-favorable limited partnership agreements or separate accounts and pledge funds arrangements. These shifts - which do not lead to significant changes in the limited partnership agreements - appear to be particularly effective for bigger funds that increasingly focus on later stage investments. We show that early stage funds are more inclined to enter into innovative collaborative agreements. Collaborative agreements differ from the traditional limited partnership agreements in that they focus less on curtailing principal agent problems and more on joint development and value creation.

Keywords: collaborative agreements, collective conservatism, corporate venture capital, government venture capital, innovation, limited partnership agreement, micro-venture capital, venture capital cycle

JEL Classification: G24, K20, K22, L22, L26

Suggested Citation

McCahery, Joseph A. and Vermeulen, Erik P.M., Conservatism and Innovation in Venture Capital Contracting (May 2013). Lex Research Topics in Corporate Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2013-2; ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 213. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2215896 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2215896

Joseph A. McCahery

Tilburg University - School of Law; European Banking Center (EBC) ( email )

Warandelaan 2
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands
+31-(0)13-466-2306 (Phone)
+31-(0)13-466-2323 (Fax)

Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)

Warandelaan 2
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels
Belgium

HOME PAGE: http://www.ecgi.org

Erik P.M. Vermeulen (Contact Author)

Tilburg University - Department of Business Law ( email )

Signify (formerly known as Philips Lighting) - Legal Department ( email )

Amstelplein 2
Amsterdam
Netherlands

Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)

Warandelaan 2
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) ( email )

c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels
Belgium

Kyushu University - Graduate School of Law ( email )

6-19-1, Hakozaki, Higashiku
Fukuoka, 812-8581
Japan

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
652
Abstract Views
2,927
rank
42,695
PlumX Metrics